Faith and Intersectionality

UAL statistics regarding staff and students who have a faith, show a 10% higher declaration rate from staff than students. This made me wonder whether students might be more hesitant to declare their faith, but I need further investigation.

In the YouTube video “Challenging Race, Religion, and Stereotypes in Classroom,” Simran Jeet Singh, a Religion Professor at Trinity University in San Antonio, Texas, discusses the importance of addressing and challenging stereotypes related to race and religion in educational settings. Singh points out that while we tend to view communities as homogenous, each community is diverse. This relates to a complexity around this unit – the struggle to reconcile differences between minority groups, such as religions and LGBTQ+ rights. In the online session it was noted that it can be difficult to be a mediator in the classroom, so looking at how faith can be expressed in multi faceted ways can be a starting point; religions are not a homogenous group so we could discuss if there is a breadth of perpectives within that religion for instance.

Singh highlights specific strategies and personal anecdotes to illustrate effective teaching methods for combating stereotypes: ‘what I like to do in my classroom or in my advocacy or even when I’m out on the street is try and demonstrate the differences that exist within these communities by challenging basic stereotypes’ so he ‘strike(s) up conversations and smile(s) and laugh(s)’ In addition he also says ‘If we can try and understand where people are coming from with empathy with sort of a human element then that allows us to really engage with difference in a way that is constructive rather than destructive’. His approach, which emphasises everyone’s common humanity and with it, empathy, while creating dialogue amongst students, resonates with my approach because it helps students engage with differences constructively. When teaching technical Adobe sessions, I encourage students to engage in a 15-minute collaborative drawing project at the start. This exercise fosters collaborative discussion and counters the isolation of sitting behind a screen for three hours. Additionally, I am considering changes to the layout of computer rooms to facilitate group work and collaboration, which are currently hindered.

Reki’s article explores Miranda Fricker’s two forms of epistemic injustice in the context of religious identity and its intersections with race and gender. For instance, Muslim women who veil may face testimonial injustice due to stereotypes about their religion and dress. Additionally, hermeneutical injustice occurs when the experiences of religious individuals are not adequately understood or represented in societal discourse, leading to their marginalisation. Hermeneutical Injustice occurs when a gap in collective interpretive resources puts someone at an unfair disadvantage in making sense of their social experiences. For instance, before “sexual harassment” was widely recognised, many women struggled to articulate their experiences of workplace misconduct. Reki emphasises considering multiple aspects of identity and intersectionality to fully understand and address epistemic injustices faced by religious individuals.

The Online session discussed the legally protected characteristics of religious and cultural observances, so if there is a structural and predictable outcome, such as the effects of fasting for Ramadan on students, we have a legal duty to remove barriers. UAL has a faith and religion calendar which I will refer to so that I can plan my projects to have least impact on students.

This entry was posted in Uncategorised. Bookmark the permalink.

2 Responses to Faith and Intersectionality

  1. Hi Steven
    I am interested in how you present this idea as a point of discussion with students:
    “religions are not a homogenous group so we could discuss if there is a breadth of perpectives within that religion for instance.”
    This comment makes me think about how you/we as Lecturers, arrive at a situation where we can have an exploratory conversation like this.
    My instinct is that a conversation around different perspectives of belief might be mediated through looking at specific examples of film, artwork, literature, and giving students the distance (in the first instance) to think about different perspectives, and if they feel they want to, bringing it back to their own experience.
    The aspect of empathy and humour that Singh highlights, and that you emphasise, also feels really important. How to be light with potentially diverging opinion and perspective.
    I found I could really think broadly about the context you present here, that you for being so clear with your own reflections.

  2. Thank you, I think you make an interesting point to see how we as lecturers can help activate a conversation around differences, a good way to start could be by looking at examples of different perspectives and seeing if students relate it to their own experiences. Together with empathy and humour, I think it would enable us to be ‘light’, as you say, with handling the discussions.

Leave a Reply to Keira Bradshaw Greene Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *